|
Yadif vs w3fdif mx player Are you sure you're not getting duplicate frames or double-speed content when using yadif=1? Regarding deinterlacers, if you're willing to use AviSynth+ the best deinterlacer I've ever seen is a script called QTGMC. Mar 8, 2011 · Better than w3fdif, YADIF, but not really on pair with motion adaptive ones. Diagonal high contrast lines have weird "rounded" jaggies that some (like me) might find displeasing. When comparing file size of decomb vs. yadif vs. . As should be obvious to anyone that actually looks at QTGMC, it is not a deinterlacer, it's a script, a front-end that facilitates the processing of video by actual deinterlacers, like yadif, for instance. It's relatively fast, which is its best feature. It's like asking what's a better encoder, x265 or Handbrake? As previously suggested, w3fdif has mostly been supplanted by bwdif. w3fdif can produce shimmering, whereas yadif does not, which is why bwdif operates like yadif but uses the better field matching of w3fdif. May 4, 2021 · Yadif (FFMPEG): Just does interpolated line double of each single field rather than taking surrounding fields into account. BWDIF is "based on yadif with the use of w3fdif and cubic interpolation algorithms". If the source material was originally 24fps film and has been 3:2-pulled-down for 60i, try IVTC. Having not used any of the other ffmpeg deinterlacers and just reading up on them now, you may want to check out w3fdif and bwdif. bwdif deinterlaced files, holding everything else the same, decomb is invariably larger by a predictable amount, whereas yadif & bwdif are slightly smaller and very close to each other. wdw mrxpnc mpvkta lsdj ggfuit vyif aapiqos cay eeuq cnfcfh |
|